Much has been written about the characteristics common across successful founders and the ways potential investors can assess whether or not a founder exhibits founder market fit. Mark Suster looks for competitive and obsessive founders, Peter Fenton talks about path and purpose as a CEO, and as a young fund we at Chicago Ventures are constantly refining the way we think about founders and the markets they are addressing. One thing that I look for is a founder’s ability to clearly articulate both the pain point that the company is going to address and why the team is uniquely positioned to solve for that pain point.
A founder’s ability to rapidly iterate on value proposition and steer a new company towards product market fit is an early and clear indication of founder market fit. In the enterprise market, successful founders leverage prior market knowledge to identify a pain point and then build their new venture around addressing that problem. In other words, founder market fit and product market fit go hand in hand.
So how do successful entrepreneurs assess a market before going after it? Mike Cook, CEO of XOR Data Exchange and founder of ID Analytics (acquired by LifeLock) provides useful advice. Before even building product for his new businesses, Mike methodically approaches the vulnerable market:
- What are incumbents offering that current customers aren’t happy with?
- What additional functionality or new products might prospective customers want?
- Would those customers be willing to pay for the offering?
- Does the team have the ability to deliver on those demands and build an impactful business?
MIKE COOK, CEO, XOR DATA EXCHANGE: “It helps a great deal if you have spent time on the customer side of your business. Knowing first-hand the pain points felt by these organizations across a broad variety of business segments has been key and helped me look at pain points from the customer side first – not the sales or vendor side. If you can’t say that without a doubt you would test or buy the service you are trying to develop, then your effort won’t work. This “insider knowledge” has helped me build strong relationships with business managers over the years.
Before starting any company, I get the pitch down (including use cases and potential benefits) and go out and talk to the people within the companies that would buy and/or influence the purchase. It’s key to talk to both the influencers, as well as senior decision makers, because often times they have completely different perspectives. If they don’t align positively with your business concept, it’s time to think about something else. Candid conversations are key. Rather than ask potential buyers if they think I have a good idea, I always ask them to point out how I will fail. Getting smart people’s perspective on why you will not succeed, in my perspective, is much more valuable
Any valuable market is going to have entrenched players. As an entrepreneur, I like that those entrenched companies are big because while they may have a hold on distribution, they are slow and less nimble. The first hurdle to competition with entrenched competitors is performance of your solution. Generally, because of switching costs and time, you must be markedly better, or your prospects will likely not give you the time of day. Ultimately, if your customers want your solution, in my industry at least, the entrenched players will partner to deliver your solution to their customers. Large companies tend to be focused more on protecting their current revenue than on organically developing new revenue streams. You can’t always count on that, but in my experience, if you have a solid concept, competition against a bigger entrenched player is not one of the worries that should keep you up at night.
Finally, if you are a new entrant into an entrenched market, you need to innovate and execute perfectly but also need to be price competitive. First, if there is currently a similar product, the price of that solution likely needs to be priced 20% or so less than entrenched players to gain market share you need to survive in the early days. Second, you need to identify a sound ROI that your customer will agree with, and price the per unit fee anywhere from 10%-20% of that ROI. I would suggest to any new entrepreneur to really understand what your customer will likely pay as early as possible and how the volume of purchases will ramp over time. Price plus volume builds revenue, and without a sound understanding of your upside, you can’t determine what costs you can sink into the business in its early stages.
I heard an outstanding quote yesterday from an investor; Yes + Time = No. If you find yourself in a situation where the customer is saying “yes” to a potential solution, but won’t commit, move along. Some people are extremely polite and hate to tell you “no”. Ideally, you can get to “yes” as fast as possible. If not, a fast “no”, in some cases, is just as good.”
Cook’s strategy for discovering and addressing pain points has served him well in the past, and we found his thoughtful and methodological approach compelling enough to merit an investment in his newest venture. As a venture fund, we want to leverage a founder’s ability to seize a latent market opportunity. It is my hope that this methodical approach can help first-time founders rapidly iterate and ask the right questions in the early stages of their company, in hopes of finding the holy grail of rapid growth.
In the late 1990’s Mike Cook approached me with his idea for identity fraud detection. One of the things he wanted to know was “How would he fail”, so I know he is “telling like it is”. He leveraged that information, and a lot of industry knowledge and hard work, into success at ID Analytics.
LikeLiked by 1 person